- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
05-16-2025 04:32 AM
Dear community!
We have configured user-ID redistribution to send mappings to firewalls from Panorama. The same config as the following:
https://www.packetswitch.co.uk/palo-alto-user-id-redistribution/
We have to panoramas in active/passive and some firewalls are having alarms like the following:
Issue description :: Redistribution Agent Panorama2(vsys1): details: close connection to agent.
Severity :: High
That´s is the passive Panorama. I assume that the passive Panorama doesn´t participate in the User-ID redistribution and thus the firewall cannot just connect to its User-ID agent service. Anyone could confirm this? I didn´t find any statement in official resources.
Thank you in advance!
05-16-2025 09:50 AM
HI @Carracido,
I can confirm similar behaviour with the NGFWs. I wrote a thread on it here: LIVEcommunity - Food for Thought - Data Redistribution during HA Failover - User-ID - LIVEcommunity ...
On a similar thread, recently I moved a configuration towards Panorama being used as the Data Redistribution Agent. I did configure the Data Redistribution Clients (the NGFWs) to connect to the Data Redistribution Agent on Panorama via host and port, however, I am curious if configuring the Data Redistribution Clients (the NGFWs) to connect to the Data Redistribution Agent on Panorama via Serial Number will make a difference. In my case, Panorama was not HA, so the problem does not apply.
Let me know your thoughts!
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!