- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
11-13-2021 01:31 PM - edited 11-13-2021 01:33 PM
Hi all, looking for advice following what is in my opinion very unusual behavior.
Where I work for, we have a PA220 running Firmware version 9.0.3 that is used as the firewall for VoIP traffic for physical desk phones. We have two brands of IP based desk phones; Yealink and Wildix. Both types/brands connect to our cloud hosted Wildix PBX and both reply on the same internal Windows DHCP server.
Today we tried moving the WAN interface to a new WAN line with a new IP.
In summary the following was updated:
PBF, IPSec, Globaal protect are not used. No firewall rules/security policy's refer to the WAN IP directly, but instead by the WAN IP object that was updated.
Following the change, only the Wildix branded phones worked as they should, with the Yealink phones now not working. The Yealink phones can still pick up the date and time via public NTP through the PaloAlto, so NAT and Firewall must have been working for the Yealink phones to a degree, just no RTP/audio type traffic for the Yealinks. Rebooting the individual phones made no difference.
Both the Yealink and Wildix phones have the same security policy on the Paloalto and talk to the same cloud hosted PBX.
If I plug a single Yealink phone directly into the new WAN line (via a PoE injector) and give it the new public IP, the phone works fine.
What would cause this odd behaviour? Was it just a caching issue on the Paloalto and it needed a simple reboot or is something more going on?
I also had the PaloAlto crash with a critical "data_plane: restarts exhausted, rebooting system" message when I first tried to validate the changes before committing them, when it got stuck and crashed at 40% during the validation process. Ended up having to redo the changes once it had recovered, and that was when I first encountered the odd behaviour of Wildix phones working fine but the Yealink ones not.
Any ideas?
Regards: Elliott.