Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
12-01-2020 01:00 AM
I have a PAYG VM-300 behind an Azure standard SKU load balancer with NSG opened up. I used this first to test the management interface and could load balance this. However when I try this on the Global protect it fails.
I have a default virtual router with a static route 0.0.0.0/0 to .1 from untrusted and a rule to 168.63.129.16/32 also to .1 from untrusted subnet. With a NAT rule it works immidiatly. Without it fails.
12-01-2020 01:07 AM
OK now I changed the outbound rule
Outbound and inbound use the same IP. SNAT port exhaustion may occur
Now it works question is what is the logic behind this.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!
