Global Protect behind Azure load balancer without NAT

Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

Global Protect behind Azure load balancer without NAT

L0 Member

I have a PAYG VM-300 behind an Azure standard SKU load balancer with NSG opened up. I used this first to test the management interface and could load balance this. However when I try this on the Global protect it fails. 

I have a default virtual router with a static route to .1 from untrusted and a rule to also to .1 from untrusted subnet. With a NAT rule it works immidiatly. Without it fails.


L0 Member

OK now I changed the outbound rule

Outbound and inbound use the same IP. SNAT port exhaustion may occur

Now it works question is what is the logic behind this.

  • 1 replies
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!