integration mirroring vs post processing script mirroring

Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

integration mirroring vs post processing script mirroring

L3 Networker

Our current setup mirrors incidents by post processing scripts. Bulk incident close makes too much noise in the system. It creates a container for each incident at the same time. It can overload the system from time to time. How does mirroring in the integration work? Does it mirror incidents one by one without creating a container for each?


L4 Transporter

Hi @EnesOzdemir, sounds like the post-processing script is not working properly. You might want to have a CSE review your script and make recommendation. Also do not use sleep commands inside post-processing scripts.


Integration incident mirroring is done at an interval for all objects in the queue. The queue could contains multiple incidents for mirroring across different integrations. 

My post processing script is simple .


I implemented mirroring for the integration and tried closing 300 incidents at once. The process was so smooth. I think mirroring has a much lighter load on the system.


I also raised a case for the container problem


Case 02338961



  • 2 replies
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!