09-04-2020 07:14 AM
I am new to using Expedition and have a question regarding the Migration Logs (generated automatically by Expedition), upon analyzing the imported running-config from my cisco asa, Under Task: NAT Analysis - Under Action - it saying No Action Required. Suggestions to review and/or remove. If partial matching, you may consider split the security rule. What does this mean? Is it ok to just leave what Expedition found during analysis (without editing and or revising). Does this mean it corrected whatever NAT issue it finds during analysis? Please let me know your thought on this. Thank you.
09-04-2020 07:58 AM
09-04-2020 08:21 AM
Thanks for your response, as requested - below Expedition Migration Logs.
09-04-2020 08:25 AM
Thanks for your response - as requested, below is the Migration Logs generated automatically by Expedition during cisco asa running-config analysis.
09-04-2020 08:45 AM
That means your NAT rules and policy based rules have different IP ranges and it is asking you to review them, this shouldn't prevent you from the migration however they might be overly permissive. NAT Rule (number) indicates which NAT rules these are so I would just compare them with the existing policy rules you have.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!