- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
11-29-2022 07:29 AM
Having imported an SRX config to Expedition, we appear to have rendered all the st0.x 'secure tunnel interfaces' in the SRX config as 'tunnel.x' in the interface section of the config but, in the virtaul router, static routes continue to reference to st0.x.
Is that what we expect ?
Simply a matter of re-wriiting the static routes ?
11-29-2022 09:10 AM
@LCMember1499 Can you please advise what version of the expedition you have ? If the interface changed name , the static route reference the interface should change as well.
11-29-2022 09:20 AM
Expedition is running 1.2.44
11-29-2022 10:26 AM
Hi @LCMember1499 We will need to see the original juniper config for further investigate, if you could share the config , please open a TAC case and write to fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com the case# . Thank you!
12-02-2022 06:50 AM
I have raised CASE 02395826 with PA TAC and have uploaded the SRX Config to it.
12-12-2022 02:49 AM
Just to advise that the upgrade to Expedition v1.2.46 fixes the issue, translating static routes from the SRX config.
Thanks.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!