unused address inside address group

Reply
Highlighted
L0 Member

unused address inside address group

Can expedition be used to determine which address objects within an address group are unused?  For example, if I have an address group that has 1000 address objects, can expedition tell me which of those address objects are not used?


Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
L3 Networker

If an address object is being referenced within an address group then it will not deem it to be unused when simply calculating unused objects. However Expedition can help with this when using rule enrichment to make your rules more effective. So the short answer is yes it can ultimately help you make your rules more effective.

 

I hope this helps.

View solution in original post


All Replies
Highlighted
L3 Networker

If an address object is being referenced within an address group then it will not deem it to be unused when simply calculating unused objects. However Expedition can help with this when using rule enrichment to make your rules more effective. So the short answer is yes it can ultimately help you make your rules more effective.

 

I hope this helps.

View solution in original post

Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the Live Community as a whole!

The Live Community thanks you for your participation!