- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
03-06-2020 06:55 AM - edited 03-06-2020 06:57 AM
Perform an upgrade from 8.1.5 directly to 9.0.6 yesterday on A/P pair of 5250. The HA2 link won't come up on 9.0.6
This is from TAC,
Check the pan_dha.log in dp0-log and dp1-log for this error,
I was able to see the following errors that explain as to why HA2 would not come up:
pan_dha.log
++++++++++++++
Error: pan_dha_config_connection_load(pan_dha_config.c:483): invalid peer ha2-ip addres
++++++++++++++
What might have happened, is that after the reboot once 9.0.6 was installed, the full configuration might not have been validated, including the HA2 config, for one internal reason or another. Physically, the interface port was healthy throughout the upgrade process, but it looks like it was an internal configuration issue. I myself have experienced issues that a commit after upgrading would fix issues that arose after the upgrade reboot.
Hope this helps others.
E
03-06-2020 02:29 PM
Hello,
Check the config on both PAN's and make sure they are correct. If still not working, try changing the HA2 config so you know its not correct, commit the changes and then change them back.
Just some thoughts.
03-06-2020 03:58 PM
Hello @OtakarKlier ,
The issue is not related to HA2 config of the firewall, as TAC explained, something went wrong in auto commit.
Suggestion 1 , commit force.
Suggestion 2, reboot the firewall.
I rolled back both firewall to 8.1.5 and upgraded to 8.1.13, then to 9.0.0, and then upgraded to 9.0.6. HA2 link stay up. Just want to share my experience to save others time and pain to do many many upgrades.
E
03-07-2020 09:48 PM - edited 03-07-2020 09:50 PM
So you went from a non-recommended upgrade path to mirroring the recommended upgrade path and your issues went away, funny how that works out 😉 ; - )
In all seriousness, this is exactly why I stress following the actual recommended upgrade path as much as I do. 95% of the time it won't matter and everything will work perfectly fine, but then 5% of the time something breaks and can cause an outage. It's better that you follow the proper process and need a bit more time for the maintenance window than have an issue and cause an unexpected outage or unexpected extended maintenance.
03-08-2020 05:16 AM
Change window is difficult to request. Don't want to fill out additional paper works to explain what happened. "Recommended" upgrade. takes 3 times long. It takes 35 minutes for a firewall to reboot (I do miss the good old days work on screenos) and I have to do 6 upgrades instead of 2.. hmm.. that is a hard sales for me.
If I knew the TAC tricks, 1) try commit force, or 2) reboot the firewall on the version that you wanted. That would have save so much time as well. Just want to share my experience and hope to save others; time and stress.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!