- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
04-19-2019 03:43 PM
So i have a Pa850, it has lots of vlans off it.
1 vlan connect to the other OSPF routers. I have OSPF on there. But what about the other interface - is it better to add them as passive OSPF or redistribute connected ?
04-22-2019 09:42 AM
My opinion,
Set them up as passive. KISS Principle: You won't have to deal with redistribution and they will NOT show up as External routes.
PS - While you're at it, try to avoid VLAN interfaces on your PANs. Use tagged subinterfaces instead if you can. This makes the config easier to deal with and you don't have to write any Layer 2 zones/rules.
04-22-2019 09:42 AM
My opinion,
Set them up as passive. KISS Principle: You won't have to deal with redistribution and they will NOT show up as External routes.
PS - While you're at it, try to avoid VLAN interfaces on your PANs. Use tagged subinterfaces instead if you can. This makes the config easier to deal with and you don't have to write any Layer 2 zones/rules.
04-22-2019 11:18 AM
Hello,
I guess it would depend on how your network is setup and what you need to redistribute vs just learn.
Regards,
04-22-2019 01:28 PM
Hi
yes thats what i do
trunk - tagged interfaces off that... not the vlan interface.
Had a play with it and the passive for each interface looked a lot nicer
04-24-2019 05:38 AM
Fantastic Alex,
I've run into that myself. The kicker is not having those routes show up as External to OSPF. Just cleaner and easier to work with IMO.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!