- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
10-22-2012 04:04 PM
Hi,
I've deployed two standalone firewalls...i.e., non-HA. And have been using the interface comment field to document the switch port that interface is connected to. I'm now building an active/passive cluster and noticed that when I sync the configs, the passive firewall gets its interface comments overwritten with the comments from the active. I don't suppose there's any way to exclude this specific portion of the config from the HA sync? Alternatively, is there any other location in the config where I can document info such as this?
Thanks and regards,
- Dave
10-22-2012 04:16 PM
Comment fields are part of running config, so they will be synchronized between the devices. So it will be overwritten. Management information are not synced between the device, but this will also not help you to document information as per your requirement. Thanks
10-22-2012 04:16 PM
Comment fields are part of running config, so they will be synchronized between the devices. So it will be overwritten. Management information are not synced between the device, but this will also not help you to document information as per your requirement. Thanks
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!