How to change RDP's default port

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

How to change RDP's default port

L1 Bithead

As you know, the RDP's default port is 3389,  but someone always try to connect via this default port, this result the domain 

 

accounts are locked frequently. so I would like to chang its default port,such as 33089, then others don't know the port,

 

so they can't use this port to try remote desktop access, the question is How I config in Palo Alto to achieve this target?

 

My device is PA-500.

 

thanks in advance

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

you won't need the custom application as your connection is normal RDP and APP-ID will identify it as that application, even if it is not running on the default port

 

you will need to make sure your security policy allows the connection

 

security.png

nat.png

Tom Piens
PANgurus - Strata specialist; config reviews, policy optimization

View solution in original post

13 REPLIES 13

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

you can accomplish this by creating a NAT policy to do port translation

 

translate.png

Tom Piens
PANgurus - Strata specialist; config reviews, policy optimization

L1 Bithead

Thank you for your reply, but could you tell me the entire process?  what is the service 7777 in your screenshot?

in my example port 7777 is the 'original' destination port

 

 

so what this rule does is from my trust network 192.168.0.0/24 to my dms 10.0.0.0/24

the firewall takes the role of host 192.168.0.5

 

anyone in the trust network connecting to 192.168.0.5 from trust, on port 7777 will be translated to dmz server 10.0.0.5 on port 3389

rdp.png

 

i can create a security policy that blocks direct connections to 3389 and only allows 7777

Tom Piens
PANgurus - Strata specialist; config reviews, policy optimization

Ok ,my question is where I can create the "original' destination port 7777"? Thanks

could you kindly show me the service 7777's screenshot?

sure! you can create service objects in 'Objects > Services'

 

7777.png

 

 

Here's an article that might be useful: Getting Started: Network Address Translation (NAT)

Tom Piens
PANgurus - Strata specialist; config reviews, policy optimization

L0 Member

You can also try to change the default port of the RDP via the registry on the server itself. 😉

Hi,

 

I have tried to change the default port number 3389 to 33089 in the server in registry. and I can use remote desktop to 

 

connect to this server by 192.168.0.5:33089 in my LAN, but I can't connect to this server's external IP address  in the internet,

 

I mean I can't connect to 218.104.xxx.xxx:33089 in the internet,  then could you tell me how should I config in the  PALO ALTO?

 

Thanks in advance.

@xiaguoxian,

That would depend on how your NAT and security policies are setup. Is your NAT statement an any-any bi-directional policy or do you have NAT policies specific to service? You're security policy will also need to have ms-rdp allowed on the service port that you've specified, or create a custom app-id based off of the ms-rdp signature but with the service being the 33089. 

Hi,

 

I have created a app-id based on ms-rdp, could you have a look at the screenshot and tell me is it right?

 

create_app_RDP33089_1.pngcreate_app_RDP33089_2.pngcreate_app_RDP33089_3.png

you won't need the custom application as your connection is normal RDP and APP-ID will identify it as that application, even if it is not running on the default port

 

you will need to make sure your security policy allows the connection

 

security.png

nat.png

Tom Piens
PANgurus - Strata specialist; config reviews, policy optimization

Hi,

According to your suggestion, my situation now is :

 

1. the server's RDP port is default port 3389

2. I create a new service on Palo Alto named  KJC-RDP,please see pic1

3.In the security policy,I create a policy,please see pic 2

4.In the NAT policy, Icreate a policy,please see pic 3

Is it correct? anything else should I do?

3.png1.png2.png

 

Hi,

 

With the help of two experts, I've solved this problem. Thank you so much.

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 6003 Views
  • 13 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!