- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
01-30-2013 11:58 AM
I currently have the following setup. Two PA's in active-passive with an L3 interface configured with zone DMZ-Web connected into a single switch. That same switch is connected to a VM host that is also in an active-passive configuration. The problem here is that the switch is a single point of failure. If we put in a second switch, can I aggregate another L3 interface and have that connect to the second switch? If one switch goes down will that allow traffic to pass over the other switch? Is there anything I'm missing here? Thanks for the feedback.
Ian
01-31-2013 05:26 AM
Hi Ian,
Traffic will be balanced between all the aggregated ports (using the last 3 bits of session), they will all be active.
You cannot choose to have some interfaces acting as backup.
Best Regards
-Nicolas
01-31-2013 05:26 AM
Hi Ian,
Traffic will be balanced between all the aggregated ports (using the last 3 bits of session), they will all be active.
You cannot choose to have some interfaces acting as backup.
Best Regards
-Nicolas
01-31-2013 06:16 AM
Ok, so traffic will be balanced over each link, but if one link goes down the Palto will just send all traffic over the one link that is up, correct?
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!