Teamviewer and Commit warning

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

Teamviewer and Commit warning

L2 Linker

We have to allow only Teamviewer on some pc's, not internet browsing.

I created rule with apps:
teamviewer (apps-group)
teamviewer-web
adobe-flash-socketpolicy-server, ssl, web-browsing

But this rule will allow web-access to all sites.

Ok, i created custom URL category profile "Only teamviewer":
teamviewer.com
*.teamviewer.com

But traffic is not hit this rule, because "teamviewer-base" returns "any" it category:
https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000Cm08CAC
"For team viewer, as it has its own decoder, it is not considered to be a web-browsing app anymore.

PAN only do the URL-Filtering in http decode for sure but it is not always for specific application decode."

Ok, i split rule:
Rule 1. teamviewer (apps-group)
teamviewer-web
adobe-flash-socketpolicy-server

Rule 2. ssl, web-browsing with URL category profile "Only teamviewer"

Rule 3. deny any

So i receive Warning while commit:
in 1st rule i use teamviewer-base and teamviewer-web, they need ssl and web-browsing, but ssl an web are denied in Rule 3

How to limit some pc without Palo Alto commit warning?

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

@aaobuhov,

Nope. No matter what you do, the validation process will only look at the rulebase by an entry by entry basis. So rule order doesn't matter here. 

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

The validation process works by verifying each security rulebase entry. This process does not take into account other entries in the security rulebase, and the validation warning will trigger if any one policy does not include all applications required for the policy to function. 

This is expected behavior, and as of yet, you are unable to suppress these commit warning messages. 

Thank you, BPry

 

Is it possible to somehow change the sequence of rules so that there are no warnings?

@aaobuhov,

Nope. No matter what you do, the validation process will only look at the rulebase by an entry by entry basis. So rule order doesn't matter here. 

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 4267 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!