- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
05-15-2017 10:55 AM
Yes, l would keep the policies separate. More secure and more granular control. But you still can use the below example (not the greatest one :D):
05-15-2017 11:31 AM
05-15-2017 11:32 AM - edited 05-15-2017 11:34 AM
Hi,
The screenshot shows from trust to trust and untrust to untrust ?
My question is it really necessary a reverse policy (from untrust to trust ) since it is a stateful firewall .
Thanks
05-15-2017 11:46 AM
05-15-2017 12:11 PM - edited 05-15-2017 12:11 PM
l think l didn't understand a question properly or the question itself was not clear 😄
Anyway, it all depends from where you are initiating your traffic. With the stateful firewall return traffic is permitted (stateful firewall as you have mentioned already)
05-15-2017 12:56 PM
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion .
If the traffic is originating from the trust to untrust , we have to create a rule (rule1) like source 'trust' and destination 'untrust',
(The return traffic from the same
If the traffic is originating from the untrust to trust ,we have to create a rule (rule2) like source 'untrust' and destination 'trust',
Correct mf If I am worng ?
Thanks
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!