Hi, will like to understand the oppinion from the PAN community about the features that are still missing or needs to be improved.
Will appreciate if you can specify by functionality like :
Must Have : A,B,C
Nice to Have : D,E,F
I haven't had the chance to compare both 1GB and 2GB models under similar loads. There are some discussions here in the forum talking about experiences with the upgrade:
We use the 2000 series firewalls with 4.0.x code. The web based interface is so slooooooooooooooow it is painful and doing a commit takes 10 minutes.
We were also unlucky to have three DOA firewalls (2 had failed disks), you do not supply kit with solid state disks and would not entertain it, so again would like to see this included.
I would also second the post from TNaami.
Documentation needs real examples in every section. Tired of searching on Communities.....
PAN-AGENT sucks. Multiple users confuses it badly.....
but please for the love of packets improve your QA process! Test all the features in the product! Test all the features when every major release comes out!
I love your turn of phrase, and 100% agree with your sentiment.
QA of late has *sucked*. Documentation and QA are my two biggest bugbears with PAN.
Nice to have: Ability to select the threat action from a threat log message - i.e. If a threat is logged ("alert"), the administrator can open the threat log and select a new action such as "block" or "reset" etc. The new action is updated in the corresponding threat profile.
MUST HAVE: SSD's for the win!!! :smileycool: all models
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!