IPSEC Tunnel query

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

IPSEC Tunnel query

L2 Linker

What is the use of Proxy ID in IPSEC tunnel configuration on Palo Alto ? When will it get negotiated and how ?

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

L6 Presenter

Hi @Khanna075 

 

Proxy-ID in Palo Alto is nothing, but interesting traffic flowing through the tunnel. Palo Alto by default only supports ROUTE BASED VPN.

Now in any case when you form tunnel from Palo Alto to the PEER which is configured/acting as POLICY BASED VPN, Proxy-ID on Palo Alto side must be configured.

And the subnets configured in Proxy-ID and the ACL on the PEER side should match for successful negotiation. This will be evaluated during PHASE-2 negotiation.

If it is not matched/identical then PHASE-2 negotiation will not be successful, and you can review related logs under system logs by filtering ‘VPN’.

 

If both ends are acting as Route Based VPN, there is no need of defining proxy-ids.

If you defined proxy-id in this case also, anyways it is not going to be evaluated during PHASE-2 negotiation.

 

You can refer below Palo Alto provided ref articles.

 

Hope it helps!

 

Ref Article 1 

Ref Article 2 

M

Check out my YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/@NetworkTalks

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5

L6 Presenter

Hi @Khanna075 

 

Proxy-ID in Palo Alto is nothing, but interesting traffic flowing through the tunnel. Palo Alto by default only supports ROUTE BASED VPN.

Now in any case when you form tunnel from Palo Alto to the PEER which is configured/acting as POLICY BASED VPN, Proxy-ID on Palo Alto side must be configured.

And the subnets configured in Proxy-ID and the ACL on the PEER side should match for successful negotiation. This will be evaluated during PHASE-2 negotiation.

If it is not matched/identical then PHASE-2 negotiation will not be successful, and you can review related logs under system logs by filtering ‘VPN’.

 

If both ends are acting as Route Based VPN, there is no need of defining proxy-ids.

If you defined proxy-id in this case also, anyways it is not going to be evaluated during PHASE-2 negotiation.

 

You can refer below Palo Alto provided ref articles.

 

Hope it helps!

 

Ref Article 1 

Ref Article 2 

M

Check out my YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/@NetworkTalks

L2 Linker

Thank you for the explanation. 
This makes sense to me now. 

L6 Presenter

Hi @Khanna075 Glad to know that it helped you. 

Could you please click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided ? This will help other readers also.

 

Thank you!

M

Check out my YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/@NetworkTalks

L2 Linker

Yes, sure!

L2 Linker

By the way I browsed to your youtube channel. Its looks good. Thank you for sharing it.

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 714 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!