Prisma Access Browser

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Prisma Access Browser

L1 Bithead

We will now deploy the prism access browser. Can the user access the internal application directly through the prisma access browser via a service connection? Or does it still need to connect to Global protect Mobile users?

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions


@DickyAnggara wrote:

Can we force gp users to only use the PAB browser? Can we set it through the policy mobile users - GP?


@DickyAnggara , Yes, you can and there are several enforcement options available:

  1. For managed devices, enforcement can be implemented via MDM/Cortex.
  2. Header or user-agent checks (less preferred, but an option).
  3. IDP proxy.
  4. PABX

I hope you find this helpful. 

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4

L3 Networker

@DickyAnggara wrote:

We will now deploy the prism access browser. Can the user access the internal application directly through the prisma access browser via a service connection? Or does it still need to connect to Global protect Mobile users?


@DickyAnggara , When deploying the Prisma Access Browser, users can access internal applications through a service connection without a need for Global Protect Mobile Users but there is a need for Explicit Proxy for this to be accomplish. Access to your Internal applications could either via GP or Explicit Proxy. I hope that is helpful. 

L1 Bithead

Can we force gp users to only use the PAB browser? Can we set it through the policy mobile users - GP?


@DickyAnggara wrote:

Can we force gp users to only use the PAB browser? Can we set it through the policy mobile users - GP?


@DickyAnggara , Yes, you can and there are several enforcement options available:

  1. For managed devices, enforcement can be implemented via MDM/Cortex.
  2. Header or user-agent checks (less preferred, but an option).
  3. IDP proxy.
  4. PABX

I hope you find this helpful. 

L1 Bithead

Thanks VIckynet.

Currently we build 1 service connection with 2 ipsec tunnels primary and secondary. However, for the secondary tunnel is not up, Phase 1 phase 2 has matched and there is no blocking.

Is the secondary ipsec tunnel behavior up if the ipsec tunnel is down? or must both be up first.

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 434 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!