- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
01-23-2014 01:01 AM
Hi
I create a address object base on a network address like 192.168.21.0/20 and when I used it as source address in my policy base forwarding rule this never match
but when I create addresse object with a range like 192.168.16.1-192.168.31.254 and when I used it as source address in my policy base forwarding rule this match
what wrong ?
is it bug?
or
I need to use the network address like 192.168.16.0/20
01-23-2014 02:35 AM
Hi Gregoux,
if the netmask is /20 then the ip-range could be .16.0 - .31.255 but in case of 192.168.21.0/20 the address is a single host-address because /20 expresses ranges like 192.168.16.0 - 192.168.31.255 or
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.15.255 and so on. There is a conflict between the ip-address an the mask.
If the mask is /24 than range is 192.168.21.0 - 192.168.21.255 and will work.
Cheers Klaus
01-23-2014 01:19 AM
Which version ? panos ?
so 192.168.16.0/20 works but 192.168.21.0/20 not ? you mean
01-23-2014 01:34 AM
Which version ? panos ?
5.0.8
so 192.168.16.0/20 works but 192.168.21.0/20 not ? you mean
YES exact
01-23-2014 02:35 AM
Hi Gregoux,
if the netmask is /20 then the ip-range could be .16.0 - .31.255 but in case of 192.168.21.0/20 the address is a single host-address because /20 expresses ranges like 192.168.16.0 - 192.168.31.255 or
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.15.255 and so on. There is a conflict between the ip-address an the mask.
If the mask is /24 than range is 192.168.21.0 - 192.168.21.255 and will work.
Cheers Klaus
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!