- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
03-18-2021 05:53 AM
I have PA850 just configured but licenses is not yet activates. I see strange age routing behavior. Is it because licenses is not activated?
03-18-2021 09:51 AM
Hi there,
Can you better describe the behavior? If you are talking about OSPF, remember PAN-OS defaults to the RFC2328 implementation which can give you unexpected path selection for External routes if you are used to working in an cisco IOS environment.
cheers,
Seb.
03-18-2021 09:25 AM
Hello,
No the license dont affect routing. I would double check the setup of interfaces/routing/policies and make sure everything is correct.
Regards,
03-18-2021 09:51 AM
Hi there,
Can you better describe the behavior? If you are talking about OSPF, remember PAN-OS defaults to the RFC2328 implementation which can give you unexpected path selection for External routes if you are used to working in an cisco IOS environment.
cheers,
Seb.
03-18-2021 10:53 AM
I have PA850 in a active passive cluster. I have static routes and default gateway and no routing protocol.
It ignores certain specific static routes and always directs traffic to default route which is resulting in communication failure. Please advise.
03-18-2021 03:40 PM
Hello again,
Can you share the output from the CLI of the active firewall of the following commands:
show interface all
show routing route
show routing path-monitor
Can you also tell us the destination prefixes which are not being routed correctly.
cheers,
Seb.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!