maybe it's not that complicated but I didn't find a post for this scenario:
The LAN of our Clients are in Location1
(~ 200 km)
The LAN of our Servers are in Location2
Location1 and 2 are using the same firewall which is stored in Location 2 because Location 1 has a dedicated line to Location 2.
The Primary connection between Location1 and 2 is via a direct connection through the backbone from our ISP - with private IPv4 Addresses. The Firewall is not involved in the LAN traffic between the locations, just for the internet access.
Everything in this case is fine, but
the secondary connection between Location1 and 2 is via a LTE Router. I've established a Site2Site VPN between the LTE Router and our PaloAlto Firewall incl a tunnel monitor to make sure the connection is always online. In this case the Firewall is involved in the "LAN" and internet traffic.
I do not know how to configure a failover for the case that the primary connection is broken and everything is going through the LTE Site2Site VPN connection.
I´ve tested the basic functionallity of the LTE connection with routes with a lower metric than the primary but that was only to make sure that the LTE is basically working -> has nothing to to with autmatic failover.
My Problem is that the environment is already productive and I only have a 60 minutes maintenance window per week and that's not that easy to find the perfect solution in this short time ( it's a PA-500 😉 could take a looot of time to commit)
Hi reaper, thanks for your answer.
I do not have access to the LTE router but I can ask our ISP to do it but I am not sure if get your point.
You mean that clients in the LTE Site2site got a different IP address than in the normal network and then I can configure different routes for that IP, right? I think that's not thaaaat easy because we have different networks in Location 1
Management, DHCP, VoiP, dedicated customer network and the DHCP Server (dhcp relay configuration) for those networks is stored in Location 2.
I think I like your second solution more 🙂
If I understand you right I need the following setup
Like before, just entries in my routing table
PBF Rule1 for LAN:
Source: Tunnel from LTE
Destination: LAN on Location2
Forwarding: Egress Interface = LAN Interface of the Firewall, Next Hop Address List = IP of the source Tunnel from LTE
PBF Rule2 for Internet:
Source: Tunnel from LTE
Forwarding: Egress Interface = External Interface of the Firewall, Next Hop Address List = IP of the source Tunnel from LTE
if the LTE performs source nat, the PaloAlto will see a whole different IP range when the backup is used, making routing as simple as adding a static route
the source nat would simply contain a state table with a mapping to the different networks, it could be a many to one, or a many to one equally sized continuous subnet, or some other implementation... the LTE would be responsible for maintaining a state table and the amount of source networks should not matter
but indeed, this is either a quick and dirty fix OR will require some thought and might be a little complex if you want to do it properly
yes, those rules will make sure that IF something comes out of the tunnel, returning traffic is then not matched/processed by routing but pbf stuffs it all back into the tunnel as part of the symmetric return
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!