Azure SAML Authentication for Admin access - HA Pair - AZURE Enterprise APP ADMIN UI

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

Azure SAML Authentication for Admin access - HA Pair - AZURE Enterprise APP ADMIN UI

L2 Linker

We have been able to configure the ADMIN UI to use SAML auth on the primary firewall to leverage MFA. The problem is the secondary firewall has a different URL, of course, to access it. We tried creating a second ADMIN UI, but you cannot assign a separate authentication profile to the two different management interfaces in a HA configuration. Has anyone had a workaround for this? 

2 accepted solutions

Accepted Solutions

I got it escalated to PA product development. When you use prelogin using a machine certificate authentication and SAML for user authentication, the SAML page on the firewall is what's causing the issue. We also are using a Windows OCSP responder to validate the certificate from a Windows server 2019 CA server.  What development came back with was it is an issue with TLS 1.2. They believe that TLS 1.3 will have support for checking for certificate OID. There is no ability to check OID of the certificate  in TLS1.2. If you have both user and machine certificates on the endpoint from the same CA, the embedded browser will prompt for a user certificate even though you are already authenticated. the workaround is to create a subordinate CA and only issue machine certificates from that CA. I found that if I used the public IP on the untrust side of the firewall and created a loopback interface using a nonroutable IP address and port 444, the issue didn't happen. You then need to nat to the untrust that loopback on 444 to port 443.  GP will only function on 443. The gotcha here is you cant use IPsec and have to use SSL VPN at the cost of about 20% or better on the performance. The more people that go to their account rep and create a request for enhancement, the more attention this will get. So far they said only 4 people have reported the issue. I see this as something more and more people are going to want to do.

View solution in original post

In the basic SAML Config, you add both firewalls as shown below

Carleton_0-1664285656034.png

 

View solution in original post

7 REPLIES 7

L2 Linker

Hi Carleton - did you ever get around this issue?

Cheers.

I managed to resolve this by adding multiple entries in the Azure SAML Identifer and reply-urls within the azure application SSO properties.

I got it escalated to PA product development. When you use prelogin using a machine certificate authentication and SAML for user authentication, the SAML page on the firewall is what's causing the issue. We also are using a Windows OCSP responder to validate the certificate from a Windows server 2019 CA server.  What development came back with was it is an issue with TLS 1.2. They believe that TLS 1.3 will have support for checking for certificate OID. There is no ability to check OID of the certificate  in TLS1.2. If you have both user and machine certificates on the endpoint from the same CA, the embedded browser will prompt for a user certificate even though you are already authenticated. the workaround is to create a subordinate CA and only issue machine certificates from that CA. I found that if I used the public IP on the untrust side of the firewall and created a loopback interface using a nonroutable IP address and port 444, the issue didn't happen. You then need to nat to the untrust that loopback on 444 to port 443.  GP will only function on 443. The gotcha here is you cant use IPsec and have to use SSL VPN at the cost of about 20% or better on the performance. The more people that go to their account rep and create a request for enhancement, the more attention this will get. So far they said only 4 people have reported the issue. I see this as something more and more people are going to want to do.

One other thing. If you have user certs that are not used from the same CA  and you delete them, the issue goes away too.

L2 Linker

I replied to the wrong thread, sorry. Yes we got this resolved by using a singe Enterprise app for both firelwalls

In the basic SAML Config, you add both firewalls as shown below

Carleton_0-1664285656034.png

 

L2 Linker

Thanks Carleton.

  • 2 accepted solutions
  • 4464 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 1 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!