This website uses Cookies. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Read our Privacy Policy.
Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew

About ericgearhart

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Scheduled Maintenance: November 14–15 (starting Nov. 14 at 12:00 AM PST)
LIVEcommunity will temporarily operate in read-only mode as we prepare to welcome Idira!
Public content will remain accessible, but log-ins, posting and community interactions will be paused during this period. Thank you for your patience!
ericgearhart
‎08-18-2015
since ‎04-26-2012
L4 Transporter
User Activity
User Profile
Latest posts by ericgearhart
View All
User Badges
Community Statistics
Member Since ‎04-26-2012 04:24 PM
Date Last Visited ‎08-18-2015 09:07 AM
Posts 411
Total Likes Received 154

Re: Intial Setup Help

by in General Topics
‎08-19-2014 06:19 AM
‎08-19-2014 06:19 AM
It is confusing, because you could use untagged subinterfaces to achieve the same thing. So there's more than one way to do it, which presents confusion ... View more

Re: Intial Setup Help

by in General Topics
‎08-18-2014 06:50 AM
‎08-18-2014 06:50 AM
Steven - you have to add IPs to the interface in question, otherwise the interface itself won't ARP out for inbound traffic. You can put mulitple /32s on an interface. Make the first IP you add have the correct subnet mask, and have all additional IPs have a /32. We do this today, right now, in production on our PAs. ... View more

Re: Intial Setup Help

by in General Topics
‎08-18-2014 06:50 AM
‎08-18-2014 06:50 AM
You can put mulitple /32s on an interface. Make the first IP you add have the correct subnet mask, and have all additional IPs have a /32. We do this today, right now, in production on our PAs. ... View more

Re: THREAT ALERT : high : 169.254.254.238 -> 169.254.255.255 Microsoft Windows NAT Helper DNS Query Denial of Service(31339) alert

by in General Topics
‎08-15-2014 05:52 AM
‎08-15-2014 05:52 AM
I hate to sound like a wet blanket, but we see a lot of false positives from PA's threat signature engine. So tiwara I would suggest you be careful in "jumping the gun" and assuming the client is infected... it might just be normal Windows behavior ... View more

Re: Has anybody encountered a situation where a rule was configured for one application but matched other applications?

by in General Topics
‎08-13-2014 05:03 AM
1 Kudo
‎08-13-2014 05:03 AM
1 Kudo
slv - see FJU's response below. I totally agree with what FJU says below ... View more

Re: Has anybody encountered a situation where a rule was configured for one application but matched other applications?

by in General Topics
‎08-13-2014 04:41 AM
2 Kudos
‎08-13-2014 04:41 AM
2 Kudos
Excuse me but this is a totally bogus explanation... so what if he put service any? The whole point of App-ID is to be port agnostic, that's how the product was sold to us. The replies above make no sense to me. ... View more

PANOS 7.0 timeline?

by in General Topics
‎07-18-2014 10:50 AM
‎07-18-2014 10:50 AM
Hey PA guys, do you have a timeline on PANOS 7.0 coming out? Thanks, Eric ... View more

Re: Assistance: my palo is not accessible.

by in General Topics
‎07-14-2014 07:33 AM
1 Kudo
‎07-14-2014 07:33 AM
1 Kudo
hshah are you speaking with the authority of someone who works for Palo Alto Networks or are you just some random forum customer? ... View more

Re: Havex Malware

by in General Topics
‎07-09-2014 08:54 AM
‎07-09-2014 08:54 AM
Havex is still flagged as benign by the public WildFire page. Havex is listed here: https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/Home/VirusDetail/2889719 But the hash shows benign, here: https://threatvault2.paloaltonetworks.com/detailreport/7933809aecb1a9d2110a6fd8a18009f2d9c58b3c7dbda770251096d4fcc18849 ... View more

Re: PANOS 6 and PA2000 series

by in General Topics
‎07-08-2014 08:36 AM
‎07-08-2014 08:36 AM
I second that, I'm not saying give up either! PA2000s were part of the "first generation" of firewalls PA produced. Any company that puts out a sufficiently revolutionary product is going to have a hard time with their first release... look at the first gen iPhone for an example. ... View more

Re: PANOS 6 and PA2000 series

by in General Topics
‎07-08-2014 05:48 AM
6 Kudos
‎07-08-2014 05:48 AM
6 Kudos
The PA2000 series is basically an "oops" series from Palo Alto. They won't officially come out and say that, but they don't even want the pair of PA2050s we have sitting in our lab back, it's that bad. You should be yelling at your SE and getting a great deal on a PA3000 if you still have PA2000s. ... View more

Re: Havex Malware

by in General Topics
‎07-02-2014 09:56 AM
‎07-02-2014 09:56 AM
I don't have a sample of the malware, I'm just "stirring the pot" to be honest ... View more

Re: Havex Malware

by in General Topics
‎07-02-2014 09:04 AM
1 Kudo
‎07-02-2014 09:04 AM
1 Kudo
... View more

Re: Havex Malware

by in General Topics
‎07-02-2014 08:25 AM
‎07-02-2014 08:25 AM
Does WildFire flag a sample as malicious yet :smileylaugh: ... View more

Re: Havex Malware

by in General Topics
‎07-02-2014 04:47 AM
1 Kudo
‎07-02-2014 04:47 AM
1 Kudo
Interestingly enough if you click on the hash links, PA's own WildFire flags it as benign! Hmph. :smileyplain: ... View more
Register or Sign-in
Contact Me
Online Status
Offline
Date Last Visited
‎08-18-2015 09:07 AM
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
RESOURCES
Khoros awards 2022
Copyright 2007 - 2026 - Palo Alto Networks