activ/passiv-cluster police in sync but different rule handling

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

activ/passiv-cluster police in sync but different rule handling

L4 Transporter


Hi everyone,

some trouble if i turn the activ one to the passiv and vice versa. the policy was syncronized but the result was different.

Same rule and same source / destination and same App (ssh). in the unsuccessful log i can't either see session- id or outbound-interface.

successful

youcef-ok.PNG.png

unsuccesful

youcef-nak.PNG.png

both ports are identically configured and are up. I appreciated any assistance.

cheers Klaus

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

L4 Transporter

Hi Hulk,

all rules using FQDN generate fqdn request and this in cooperation with service route ( external-IF / untrust ) didn't work on the passiv firewall because this interface weren't up and no dns-request couldn't be satisfied.

Then it turned into activ-mode but the dns-refresh takes about 30 minutes ( or cli: request system fqdn refresh)

So to solve the problem i had to adjust the policy or and this is easier the service route (Mgmt-IF). Thanks for your support.

Regards Klaus

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

L7 Applicator

Hello Klaus,

Could you please check the routing table, if there is a valid route available through ethernet-1/5 for destination and sequence of the security policy on policy table. If possible, bring the Unix-admin rule in the top and verify the result.

CLI command > test security-policy-match source destination destination-port protocol.

Thanks

L4 Transporter

Hi Hulk,

all rules using FQDN generate fqdn request and this in cooperation with service route ( external-IF / untrust ) didn't work on the passiv firewall because this interface weren't up and no dns-request couldn't be satisfied.

Then it turned into activ-mode but the dns-refresh takes about 30 minutes ( or cli: request system fqdn refresh)

So to solve the problem i had to adjust the policy or and this is easier the service route (Mgmt-IF). Thanks for your support.

Regards Klaus

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 1950 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!