01-08-2025 07:37 PM
Say I have site-to-site IPsec tunnels from my Palo to 2 different peers. How do I handle the case when the 2 peers have the same or overlapping networks? Do I ask one of the peers if they can NAT their network to something that doesn't conflict with my other peer? What if neither peer is able to NAT?
01-08-2025 07:58 PM
Hi @RaymondLeeDOT ,
It would be easiest for you if one of the peers can handle NAT on their end and use a subnet that works for your environment. If none of the peers can handle NAT, you'll have to create 2 separate subnets for each peer and take care of the NAT for their connections.
01-10-2025 11:39 AM
Hi @JayGolf,
If I were to do the NATing on my end, can you explain why I would need 2 separate subnets? I would just need to NAT for one of the peers in order to resolve the IP overlap, right? Assuming that I'm NATing 192.168.1.0/24 to 172.16.1.0/24 for Peer X, do my static routes and NAT rules below look correct?
However, if I need to create more tunnels to other peers who also use 192.168.1.0/24 on their side, then it's going to be a NATing nightmare for me.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!
