Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
08-09-2023 08:35 AM
Silly question but if you have multiple virtual routers in which virtual router should a static route be defined ? I guess it would be the VR associated with packets source adapter/associated zone ?
08-09-2023 08:59 AM
I understand now. Thank you. I know it's stupid but I sometimes need to remember that PA VR are just same as normal routers !
08-09-2023 08:41 AM
Hi there,
A static route should be put in any VR which the traffic stream will transit and the destination prefix is not readily available in the routing table as either a dynamic or connected entry.
cheers,
Seb.
cheers,
Seb.
08-09-2023 08:49 AM
So if I have an 'internal' VR and 'external' VR if the packet is coming from 'internal' adapter/zone direction and destination is on 'external' adapter/zone side I could put the static route in either VR ?
08-09-2023 08:55 AM - edited 08-09-2023 08:56 AM
If the traffic flow is bi-directional, as neither VR will have a route to the destination prefix you will need a static route in both VRs.
Why not run a routing protocol between the VRs to reduce this overhead?
08-09-2023 08:59 AM
I understand now. Thank you. I know it's stupid but I sometimes need to remember that PA VR are just same as normal routers !
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!
