- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
03-06-2023 02:42 AM - edited 03-06-2023 02:44 AM
Hello everyone! I'm new to the Palo Alto Firewall and I've been reading the documentation on securing applications in Azure using Palo Alto's firewall here https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/guides/azure-architecture-guide.
While going through the documentation, I noticed that it talks about achieving firewall resiliency in Azure using availability sets, but I'm curious if there is any specific guidance available that covers the regional high availability design approach while deploying the PA FW in two different regions. Specifically, I'm wondering how the FW would be deployed in two hub networks housed in two different Azure regions, and if there are any design patterns on deploying the FW in such a model.
Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
03-07-2023 01:27 AM
Thanks for your comment, and yes, that is accurate; however, I am keen about the route design considerations because you would end up with two distinct hub networks (one in each region, which is typically where you would house your VM-series PA boxes). What is your suggestion in this regard? Is it recommended to peer both hubs in order to build a model similar to global transit architecture in which your secondary PA FW only gets requests if the primary region fails?
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!