04-08-2015 04:28 AM
3 years ago, we replaced Check Point firewalls with Palo Alto Networks.
Seems this was a huge mistake. We might have to go back …..
"Palo Alto Networks, a newcomer to security, falls short in their architecture and solutions"
And it's not even April Fools' day....
04-09-2015 05:48 AM
We have been looking to replace our existing ASA with either Palo Alto or CheckPoint. Have you had a bad experience with Palo Alto?
04-09-2015 06:27 AM
pretty old information in the document.
@matthew.cosgove we have been a PA customer for about 4 years and have been very satisfied. Also we are a former CP customer but have no regrets for switching to PA.
04-09-2015 08:00 AM
Let's see, a link to a direct competitor that "shockingly" criticizes PA! Shill much?
Happy Palo Alto customer for over five years now....
04-09-2015 10:08 AM
We just did a PoC last year between Checkpoint and PA. While the Checkpoint had quite a few really nice features, they were all features that we weren't looking for in our NGFW, and the Checkpoint admin interface was so kludgey that we opted for PA. We've been VERY happy with it.
04-09-2015 01:24 PM
I think Dulle was ironic.
Half of arguments there can be dismissed in 5 minutes of thinking and research. Other require 10 more minutes 
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!
