Software Version 11.1.5-h1

[Suhail-Hameed]

Hello,

We are experiencing packet loss, and the IPsec tunnels are going down on the following version and model:

• Software Version: 11.1.5-h1
• Model: PA-1420

After restarting the firewall, it resumes normal operation.

I want to know, this version is stable, any advise. 

[kiwi]

Hi @Suhail-Hameed ,

11.1.5-h1 is a new version. It's too soon to be considered a preferred version.

Currently 11.1.4-h7 is the preferred version in the 11.1.x PAN-OS.

Please bookmark this page to know which OS versions are preferred:

Support PAN-OS Software Release Guidance

Kind regards,

-Kim.

[ksauer507]

Kiwi,

I can understand why they went to 11.1.5-h1, because in the Palo CVE-2024-0012 and CVE-2024-9474 it clearly states affected ; less than 11.1.5-h1.  Unaffected: greater than or equal to 11.1.5-h1.

We were on 11.1.2 and moved to 11.1.4-h7.  Its a preferred release and the notes state that these CVE fixes are in there, and preferred as of 11/18/2024. 

I would just like clarification as to if we are really protected, because these links lead you to believe in the 11.1 train you need 11.1.5-h1 or newer.  Please advise.

https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2024-0012

https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2024-9474

Now look at the releases post:
https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-...

P*	11.1.4-h7	11/18/24	Preferred Release [11/18/24] Note: A fix was made to address CVE-2024-0012 (PAN-SA-2024-0015) and CVE-2024-9474. Note: If using IoT Security, wifclient might exit multiple times causing firewall to reboot.  Workaround: Uninstall IoT License and disable Enhanced Application Logs Note:  <meta charset="utf-8" /> If using IoT Security, the device may run into wifclient crashes during server cert verification causing dataplane to restart Workaround: Use below CLI to disable CRL  debug iot eal key-value PAN_ICD_SERVER_CERT_USE_CRL=False Note: [PA-5400f Platforms Only ] Extremely high receive packet rate can cause an interrupt storm leading to heartbeat failures and dataplane down.

So which one is it?

[ksauer507]

I opened a case with Palo to confirm the discrepancy between the CVE publications and the release notes posting.  They did confirm and I have it in writing that yes, both CVE's are also fixed in 11.1.4-h7.  Although the CVE notification claims you need 11.1.5-h1 or newer, that is not the case.  If the OP upgraded to 11.1.5-h1 because of the CVE, I feel bad he was mislead into a release that was not ready.  Hopefully PAN will update the CVE documentation.