- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
06-24-2013 08:14 PM
Hi lisiecki,
If we see in https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2344, there will be no scanning performed on the session in Application Override.
07-23-2014 01:42 AM
I have a related question about application override.
Let's say we created custom app my-telnet.
Then we created an application override rule which identifies traffic let's say from network 10.10.10.0/24 to host 172.24.24.24 on port 24 as my-telnet
In security rules we have a more general rule allowing traffic from 10.0.0.0/8 to 172.24.0.0/16 for all applications on all ports. (so basically custom application my-telnet is not used anywhere in security policy)
Will session from 10.10.10.0/24 to host 172.24.24.24 on port 24 be recognised as my-telnet?
07-23-2014 02:50 AM
you will need to have the specific rule before the general rule for it to be recognized. Firewall rules are processed from top down and stop processing on the first match.
07-23-2014 03:38 AM
Thanx for the answer but I think you're wrong.
I've decided to test it; I've created 'myapp' with no protocol/port.. definition.
I've created application override rule saying anything from certain IP address to destination port 222 is 'myapp'
I've created security policy with one rule which allows all traffic for all apps on any port.
Session from the IP address defined in application override rule to port 222 was recognised as 'myapp'
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!