Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Get Started
- News & Events
- Collaboration
- Education Services
- Technologies
- Next-Generation Firewall
- GlobalProtect
- Threat Prevention Services
- Endpoint Protection
- SSL Decryption
- App-ID
- Content-ID
- User-ID
- 5G
- IoT Security
- Cloud Identity Engine
- Panorama
- AIOps for NGFW
Network Security
- Prisma Access
- Prisma Cloud
- Prisma SD-WAN
- Cloud NGFW for AWS
- CN-Series
- VM-Series:
- Private Cloud
- OCI
- Alibaba
- AWS
- GCP
- Azure
Cloud Security
- Cortex XDR
- Cortex XSOAR
- Cortex Data Lake
- Cortex Xpanse
Security Operations
- Resources
- COVID-19 Response Center
About kdd
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About kdd
03-06-2019
89Posts
9Likes
6Solutions
Mar 06, 2019Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by kdd
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2506 | 01-26-2017 01:59 AM | |
| 11458 | 01-25-2017 07:04 AM | |
| 5619 | 01-25-2017 05:39 AM | |
| 4419 | 01-20-2017 01:12 AM | |
| 2414 | 01-20-2017 12:55 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 01-10-2017 02:02 AM | |
| 1 Like | 01-20-2017 12:55 AM | |
| 1 Like | 01-18-2017 02:30 AM | |
| 1 Like | 01-02-2013 04:37 AM | |
| 1 Like | 02-14-2014 05:54 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 2 Likes | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 18 Likes |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 09-05-2011 05:38 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 03-06-2019 05:49 AM |
| Posts | 89 |
| Total Likes Received | 9 |
03-21-2014
07:57 AM
Hi ateo, maybe the mtu-size is to small (default = 1500 byte). you can change the mtu-size if you look at an interface. Keep in mind that every other involved network-device could be a reason for the mtu-size. There are different tools to find the right size if this is the problem. Regards Klaus
... View more
03-21-2014
07:23 AM
Hi acole, try this: got to tab "device" and on the left use "schedules" thats where you configure the working-time-frame of the rule . then you can use this object under "options" in rule. hope thats what you want. Cheers Klaus
... View more
03-21-2014
07:10 AM
Hi rrau, on this site http://www.eicar.org/85-0-Download.html (you can also google for the eicar-testfile). This file should trigger a log-entry. Cheers Klaus
... View more
03-21-2014
12:05 AM
Hi Kdaitadmin, please look here where they discussed http ddos and found a solution. https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/message/29281#29281 maybe this meets you needs. Regards Klaus
... View more
03-17-2014
01:23 AM
Hi Jahnavi, we have a HA pair and its working fine so far. So no problem with licence. . Is it right that the config will not be syncronized in this case and i have to do it seperately? Regards Klaus
... View more
03-14-2014
02:56 AM
one log-entry in detail: how do i get the multi-vsys setting even?
... View more
03-14-2014
02:27 AM
Hello Hulk, what i found is that: repeating message in dp0-log but overnight the yellow marked objects are gone. I would activate multi vsys again but how long does it take and i want to be a little bit more convinced in doing this. Cheers Klaus
... View more
03-13-2014
04:27 PM
Hi, after i activated vsys i got messages that the backup device is suspended because of the different multi vsys config. Management CPU of the activ device was about 30% and even after 20 minutes nothing happend. Then i did a reboot on the backup device. It seems to be that everything is normal. but then i saw this on activ device: and that on backup device: and to make it a little bit more confusing: this could be seen on both device ( activ / passiv vice versa) Before i updated the PAN-OS to 6.0.1 from 5.0.11. Any ideas i would appreciate. Thx Klaus
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Configuration
-
Management
-
Troubleshooting
03-13-2014
12:42 PM
Hi, how is that possible that a lot of syn flood packets have as destination 0.0.0.0 There are certain IP-Adresses protect against syn-flood and of course they will be dropped like thos one. But destination address with 0.0.0.0 looks for me like ????. Is there an explanation or hint for out there? Thx Kind regards Klaus
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Networking
-
Troubleshooting
03-11-2014
04:57 AM
hi minow, please try the command: - test security-policy-match source xxx destination xxx protocol xxx show-all yes - test security-policy-match source xxx destination xxx protocol xxx from xxx to xxx show-all yes ( protocol: for example 80 is the right number for http from: source zone to: destination zone the result will show which rule is taken. I guess there is a mismatch between interface and zones. Regards Klaus
... View more
03-10-2014
02:16 AM
Hi slv, i don't know if this is still an issue for you if so please check the router config for NAT. Maybe this is a reason to let appear the router a source towards to PA. Regards Klaus
... View more
02-28-2014
12:33 AM
Hi slv, this paket isn't allowed by the rule "Lan_A - blokowanie". If you want the data to go through then there should be a rule to allow this traffic. Port 135 belongs to MSRPC (Netbios 137-139) . Let me know how ends. Regards Klaus
... View more
02-27-2014
03:18 AM
I checked the http-header-fields and i found nothing else as the user-agent-string. So it is like cat and mouse game. Everyone who knows the user-agent-string is able to let the browser appear as what ever it is wanted. Thx for your help
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-06-2019
05:49 AM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks
