- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
08-19-2021 02:31 PM
Hi,
We are a medium-sized consumer software publisher .
We're using the VirusTotal Monitor service (you should know what and for what it is) and now we'd like to report the following "generic.ml" false-positives by your VT engine :
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/7c44cc85dc23b55d8ded3cd3623d997c937d03e7b04eee402c97be181e630e66:
SEE THE SEAL SERVED BY VTmonitor AND DOWNLOAD FILE SAMPLE
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/f045f39a9e765f4d2e331e81d4dfc3116d2cb0aa569948b41e8c306180e40489:
SEE THE SEAL SERVED BY VTmonitor AND DOWNLOAD FILE SAMPLE
The given files are the components of the software we develop, and we wonder why VirusTotal Monitor can't handle these false-positives of yours against them for a long time so that we're even enforced to additionally make this submission here manually? Aren't you, PaloAlto guys, playing fair? Could you please take a look into and resolve the issue ?
Regards,
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!