Enhanced Security Measures in Place:   To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.

Allow domain services through PAN 2050

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Allow domain services through PAN 2050

Not applicable

I am trying to allow windows active directory services (2008 domain) through the firewall, in between zones.  I have created my policy to allow the following applications:

active-directory

ms-ds-smb

msrpc

netbios-ss

dns

ms-win-dns

ms-wins

netbios-dg

ms-netlogon

I have created rules for bi-directional access.

I am unable to join a server to the domain however.  I ran a packet capture and was seeing netbios traffic being dropped (UDP 137) but I have allowed several app-id applications that allow this protocol.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

L4 Transporter

Do you have any security profiles enabled? (I've noticed that joining a computer to the domain sets of the IPS/IDS if the profile is restrictive.)

Do you have any service/ports defined in the security policy? I've left mine to any because AD uses some many different ephemeral ports.

Edit: I checked my rule, and these are all the apps I have allowed for AD:

active-directory

dns

icmp

kerberos

ldap

ms-ds-smb

ms-netlogon

msrpc

netbios-dg

netbios-ss

ntp

ping

rpc

Message was edited by: Matthew Harding

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

L4 Transporter

Do you have any security profiles enabled? (I've noticed that joining a computer to the domain sets of the IPS/IDS if the profile is restrictive.)

Do you have any service/ports defined in the security policy? I've left mine to any because AD uses some many different ephemeral ports.

Edit: I checked my rule, and these are all the apps I have allowed for AD:

active-directory

dns

icmp

kerberos

ldap

ms-ds-smb

ms-netlogon

msrpc

netbios-dg

netbios-ss

ntp

ping

rpc

Message was edited by: Matthew Harding

Thanks!  It looks like adding kerberos, rpc, and ldap seemed to do the trick. 

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 3522 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!