Inter Zone traffic

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Inter Zone traffic

L0 Member

I have created a policy rule in palo alto from INSIDE zone to OUTSIDE zone all the traffic is allowed. and I am able to ping from a inside device to a outside host however when I try to ping from outside host to the inside host it is not working.

 

Do I need to create allow rules from OUTSIDE zone to INSIDE as well?

because in ASA when we intiate the traffic from inside to outside then outside to inside traffic is allowed automatically and we do not need to create rules as the cisco ASA allows traffic by just checking the active session if it were initiated already from the inside zone which has the higher securiy level.

 

please help me understard this concept in palo alto.

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

L4 Transporter

@Ayush_paloalto This is called stateful inspection, so the return path for sessions is implicitly allowed.

Furthermore, apps which negotiate random high ports like RPC, FTP, SIP/RTP etc. are automatically detected and implicit rules are in place for these sessions.

So with the zone concept, you allow ping from zone inside to zone outside and that work's fine, as you said.

But your second scenario, ping from zone outside to zone inside is not covered by your rule and so will be matched to the interzone default policy, which per default drops the traffic.

 

So in short: yes, everything works as expected, return traffic is implicitly allowed and you need an additional rule

Best Regards
Chacko

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1

L4 Transporter

@Ayush_paloalto This is called stateful inspection, so the return path for sessions is implicitly allowed.

Furthermore, apps which negotiate random high ports like RPC, FTP, SIP/RTP etc. are automatically detected and implicit rules are in place for these sessions.

So with the zone concept, you allow ping from zone inside to zone outside and that work's fine, as you said.

But your second scenario, ping from zone outside to zone inside is not covered by your rule and so will be matched to the interzone default policy, which per default drops the traffic.

 

So in short: yes, everything works as expected, return traffic is implicitly allowed and you need an additional rule

Best Regards
Chacko
  • 1 accepted solution
  • 3821 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!