- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
02-02-2018 04:44 AM
Hi,
Does anyone know if this signature is expected to trigger based on *unencrypted* SSL traffic, or on a Meterpreter session in a decrypted session?
Obviously the former would be useful (to say the least) - but assume it will be trying to detect based on aspects of the certifcate being used (assuming no custom cert has been injected into the stage(r)) as that would be the most likely visible trait.
We've done some testing and never see it fire - we wouldn't expect it to be 100% reliable in either case, but knowing the conditions it may trigger under would be useful to gauge it's protection capabilities.
02-05-2018 01:43 PM
The signature is based off clear-text of the actual 'reverse https tool' payload being transferred over the wire.
If the tool is transferred using HTTPS then SSL Decryption should take place before-hand for the IPS engine to pattern-match with this signature.
02-05-2018 01:43 PM
The signature is based off clear-text of the actual 'reverse https tool' payload being transferred over the wire.
If the tool is transferred using HTTPS then SSL Decryption should take place before-hand for the IPS engine to pattern-match with this signature.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!