We have two PA's connecting to one ISP. One is just being set up.
The ISP is "10.10.10.0/27"
Route is "10.10.10.5"
Is it correct to have both firewall external vlan interfaces as such
And for the NAT
FW1 Main Nat "10.10.10.99/27"
FW2 Main Nat "10.10.10.122/27"
I ask, because the new firewall is logging packets for the old firewall. I am seeing "x.x.x.99" on the firewall with VIP "x.x.x.122"
It's easy to get confused by Palo Alto's various uses of VLAN.
A "VLAN" interface is different from a "Layer 3" interface that has 802.1q vlan tags enabled.
On a PA device "VLAN" interfaces are used to create a virtual switch using ports on the firewall, and allow them to operate as layer 2 interfaces without routing abilities. Essentially, it create a bridged interface using all the VLAN interfaces.
If you want to enabled tagged (or untagged) 802.1q vlans on interfaces, then configure them as "Layer 3" and create sub-interfaces with the vlan tag set there.
Would be nice if PA updated their UI to remove the ambiguous and confusing "VLAN" interface type. "Bridge" would be more accurate.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!