An error has occurred when reading existing sub-variable "moderator_preview"; see cause exception! The type of the containing value was: extended_hash+string (lithium.coreapi.webui.template.models.NamedValueByNameTemplateModel wrapped into f.e.b.StringModel) ---- FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related): - Failed at: #assign redirect_moderation_page_url ... [in template "lingotek_macro_header.ftl" at line 221, column 1] - Reached through: #include "lingotek_macro_header.ftl" [in template "Lingotek_Global_Function" at line 1, column 1] ----

Panorama high MIB memory

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
An error has occurred when reading existing sub-variable "moderator_preview"; see cause exception! The type of the containing value was: extended_hash+string (lithium.coreapi.webui.template.models.NamedValueByNameTemplateModel wrapped into f.e.b.StringModel) ---- FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related): - Failed at: #assign redirect_moderation_page_url ... [in template "lingotek_macro_header.ftl" at line 221, column 1] - Reached through: #include "lingotek_macro_header.ftl" [in template "Lingotek_CP_Dashboard" at line 51, column 9] ----

Panorama high MIB memory

L3 Networker

 

Hello community!

 

We are monitoring the Panorama system resources and we get alerts regarding memory (MIB). We don´t have any performance issues though.

Can you advice if the following memory levels are fine or it´s too little memory free?

 

> show system resources

top - 15:54:07 up 144 days, 33 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.68, 0.76, 0.87
Tasks: 352 total,   1 running, 349 sleeping,   0 stopped,   2 zombie
%Cpu(s):  0.4 us,  0.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 98.5 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.4 si,  0.0 st
MiB Mem :  64402.4 total,    438.4 free,  60271.7 used,   3692.3 buff/cache
MiB Swap:   2047.9 total,      0.0 free,   2047.9 used.   3624.3 avail Mem 

 

Thank you!

1 REPLY 1

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

@Carracido,

The way that you mention the issue makes it sound like you have an outside monitoring solution sending alerts, not Panorama itself correct? I would not worry about resources unless panorama is sending alerts itself, and from what you've posted it shouldn't be. Using default values on an outside monitoring solution pretty much always needs to be adjusted for PAN.

  • 73 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!