- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
09-05-2024 08:33 AM
Hi,
I would like some guidance on which data source I should use when integrating Proofpoint TAP into XSIAM.
In the content pack "Proofpoint TAP" on the marketplace,
There is a data source named "Proofpoint TAP". This data source has the ability to fetch alerts, and it ingests into the "proofpoint_tap_v2_generic_alert_raw" data set. However it does not come with an associative data modeling rule. It does come with a correlation rule "Proofpoint TAP v2 Alerts (automatically generated)"
This method appears to have come from installing the Proofpoint TAP content pack on the marketplace
There is another data source named "Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection" which can also fetch alerts, and it ingests into the "proofpoint_tap_raw" data set. It does come with a data modeling rule "[MODEL: dataset=proofpoint_tap_raw, content_id="ProofpointTAP"]" but it does not come with an associative correlation rule.
This method appears to be installed available by default XSIAM documentation
Both of these are stated to be supported by Palo Alto XSIAM. Why the difference here? Which one should be used? Should both be used, but in different ways? Why doesn't one come with a data modeling rule and why doesn't the other come with a basic correlation rule? Is the documentation out of date. Should the customer be redirected in the documentation to use the one in the "Proofpoint TAP" content pack?
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!