Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
02-20-2017 07:55 AM
Looking for some feedback on anyone's experience with both/either.
In the Cisco realm say a mesh of 50 some sites each router has a tunnel between each site and a connection can go direct to the other location because routing is shared across the entire mesh.
In Palo's LSVPN solution is that how it works as well? Are routes shared between each site's PA device and subsequently a host at each site could talk direct to the other site without having to go through a middle-man?
Also any gotcha's you might have seen in Palo's LSVPN design?
Thanks,
Brandon
