LIVEcommunity - Who Me Too'd this topic

Looking for some feedback on anyone's experience with both/either.

In the Cisco realm say a mesh of 50 some sites each router has a tunnel between each site and a connection can go direct to the other location because routing is shared across the entire mesh.

In Palo's LSVPN solution is that how it works as well? Are routes shared between each site's PA device and subsequently a host at each site could talk direct to the other site without having to go through a middle-man?

Also any gotcha's you might have seen in Palo's LSVPN design?

Thanks,

Brandon

Who Me Too'd this topic

L1 Bithead

Me Too date:

Unlock your full community experience!

Who Me Too'd this topic

LSVPN versus Cisco DMVPN