This website uses Cookies. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Read our Privacy Policy.
Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Who Me Too'd this solution

howardtopher
L2 Linker

‎09-11-2018 11:24 AM

So here's what I ended up doing.

 

One portal.  It's on a floating IP that floats from firewall to firewall as needed.

Two gateways, one for each firewall.  IP is on the interface itself, not floating.  Each gateway has its own block of IPs for VPN terminations.  Portal is configured to have both gateways with equal priority (let the client decide where to connect). 

 

So far this is the cleanest and removes the routing problem.  The only issue is that failover is not clean for users that are currently connected as the client has to terminate one tunnel and reconnect to the other gateway, but it does work.

View solution in original post

2 people found this solution to be helpful.
Who Me Too'd this solution
LEGAL NOTICES
RESOURCES
Khoros awards 2022
Copyright 2007 - 2025 - Palo Alto Networks