This website uses Cookies. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Read our Privacy Policy.
Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
Next-Generation Firewall Discussions
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls provide true, complete visibility everywhere, along with precise policy control. Ask your questions or provide insightful answers in the discussion forum specific to NGFW.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Next-Generation Firewall Discussions
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls provide true, complete visibility everywhere, along with precise policy control. Ask your questions or provide insightful answers in the discussion forum specific to NGFW.
About Next-Generation Firewall Discussions
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls provide true, complete visibility everywhere, along with precise policy control. Ask your questions or provide insightful answers in the discussion forum specific to NGFW.

Discussions

Start a conversation

Welcome to the Next-Generation Firewall Discussions!

To make this forum valuable and enjoyable for everyone, please review the following guidelines before participating: Rules and Best Practices Be Respectful: Treat fellow community members with professionalism and courtesy. Constructive discussions are encouraged; disrespectful or inflammatory comments are not. Stay On-Topic: This board is d...

JayGolf by • Community Team Member
  • 4722 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 1 Likes

4-Node Cluster (2x Active/Active) and "orphaned" zone

Hi,I'm looking for some insight into the workings of the multi-node cluster functionality when there are more than two nodes. Let's say I have two Active/Active pairs that are clustered with a HA4 Interface. In this case I more specifically wonder how the behavior of session/state synchronization would work if the HA-Pairs had a Zone named d...

Johande by • L1 Bithead
  • 1391 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Resolved! IP address being blocked by PAN Malicious IP Feeds Inbound on PA820

Hello, IP address 74.102.229.126 is being blocked by Palo Alto's Malicious IP Feeds Inbound rule. However this is a network that should be allowed on customer s company. We cannot see a way of submitting an IP address to whitelist. on below link we have: https://urlfiltering.paloaltonetworks.com/query/  URL: 74.102.229.126  Categori...

Resolved! BGP sessions reset or not - Active-Standby HA

Hello All, I have a few BGP related questions regarding Palo Alto Network firewalls HA active-standby setup. Scenario:* eBGP to internal/trust network* static default route for WAN/untrust side* floating IPs are used Qs:1. During failover, is the the BGP session state re-established on the passive firewall? That is, the BGP session is not synce...

Resolved! Assistance Required for Firewall HA Peer Upgrade

Hi Team, We are planning to upgrade our firewall HA peer to the preferred release. Currently, the firewalls are running the following versions: 10.1.14-h6 11.0.6-h1 I need assistance with the following points: <1> Can you confirm the latest preferred release for our firewall? I came across an article indicating 11.1.4-h7 as the preferred v...

M.Manwal by • L0 Member
  • 1592 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Resolved! Downgrade of Active - Passive PA-220 HA Pair

We have a pair of PA -220 (Active - Passive) Currently on 10.2.11 The customer want to downgrade these back to the 10.1 Feature Release. They were on 10.1.13 earlier in the year, before we upgraded them to 10.2.9-h1 and then again to 10.2.11 to try and fix an issue with disk space etc. I just want to double check the downgrade instructio...

G.Blake by • L0 Member
  • 1382 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Zone protection profile

Hi All, I'm planning to implement Zone protection on outside interfaces using Strict IP Address Check" or only "Spoofed IP address" in the packet based attack protection of the zone protection profile. Does it drop legitimate traffic as per below points 1) Configure static one to one Snat and vice versa for reverse natting2) Does it impact if a...

How to actually get support?

Purchased a pair of PA-1410's last month. Within 3 days one of the power supplies was dead. Account rep said submit a tac case, but the device isn't showing up in the portal so i'm blocked there. Tried calling the support number which sent me here then hung up. Any thoughts? Wonding if one of my fortigate power supplies that have run for 7 ...

S.Mack by • L0 Member
  • 1245 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

Forward Proxy & SSL Inbound Inspection Certificate Comparasion

Hello,1- The CA and Keys checkboxes in the Certificates section of Palo Alto Firewall should always be selected? respectively the certificates used for Forward Proxy and SSL Inbound Inspection should always have CA selected and Keys imported?2- We use just one self-signed certificate for Forward Trust and Untrust proxy. So we need to import this...

Software Version 11.1.5-h1

Hello, We are experiencing packet loss, and the IPsec tunnels are going down on the following version and model: Software Version: 11.1.5-h1 Model: PA-1420 After restarting the firewall, it resumes normal operation. I want to know, this version is stable, any advise.

Recent 0-Days (Watch Towr Labs findings)

We have been a client of Palo Alto's for years, but given this report and the recent 0 days are not as committed to staying with the company in the upcoming refresh. Has their been any guidance from Palo Alto on how they intend to address, what appears to be, poor software architecture in the underlying code of their firewalls?

dkaliel by • L0 Member
  • 637 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 Likes
  • 1621 Posts
  • 61 Subscriptions
Top Solution Authors
View All
LEGAL NOTICES
RESOURCES
Khoros awards 2022
Copyright 2007 - 2026 - Palo Alto Networks