Next-Generation Firewall Discussions
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls provide true, complete visibility everywhere, along with precise policy control. Ask your questions or provide insightful answers in the discussion forum specific to NGFW.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Next-Generation Firewall Discussions
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls provide true, complete visibility everywhere, along with precise policy control. Ask your questions or provide insightful answers in the discussion forum specific to NGFW.
About Next-Generation Firewall Discussions
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls provide true, complete visibility everywhere, along with precise policy control. Ask your questions or provide insightful answers in the discussion forum specific to NGFW.

Discussions

Welcome to the Next-Generation Firewall Discussions!

To make this forum valuable and enjoyable for everyone, please review the following guidelines before participating: Rules and Best Practices Be Respectful: Treat fellow community members with professionalism and courtesy. Constructive discussions are encouraged; disrespectful or inflammatory comments are not. Stay On-Topic: This board is d...

JayGolf by Community Team Member
  • 4730 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 1 Likes

Commit error<mlav-engine-urlbased-enabled unexpected here> after upgrade version to 10.2.10

we upgrade pa-5220 version to 10.2.10 ,and then meet a commit failed as below,anybody have same question and anybody could give me some suggestion? Validation Error: profiles -&gt; url-filtering -&gt; STD_UF -&gt; mlav-engine-urlbased-enabled unexpected here profiles -&gt; url-filtering is invalid Commit failed

Unable to Apply Group based Security Policy

Hello Team, We have successfully integrated LDAP with the Palo Alto firewall, and user-ID mapping via the user-ID agent is functioning as expected. We are able to use LDAP users in the security policy without any issues. However, when attempting to apply LDAP groups to the policy, the policy does not seem to work as intended. We have configu...

Wrong categorization of traffic to icmp,tracert and communication break for web traffic

Hi team, We facing issue with PA firewall that, traffic from browser or application categorized to ICMP related and match to ping enabled rule in mass.Due to this, return traffic of the TCP session drops and application communication interrupts intermittently. Based on our findings, the rule "Rule ID 26" which applications are set with "i...

Suhairul_Salleh_0-1727407293953.png

Resolved! migrating from 5220 to 3440 - 40 G interface question

Ports 21 and 22 on the 5520 device, which are 40G interfaces, are currently in use. We need to migrate this device to the 3440 model. However, on the 3440, I don't see a specific 40G interface listed. Instead, the documentation suggests using ports 35 and 36 for 40G connectivity, utilizing a breakout cable. This information is somewhat confusing...

Resolved! ingress/egress interfaces part of firewall session?

Hello, I'd like to configure a NGFW with dual routed interfaces on some zone, call it "outside." If some host on the inside zone initiates traffic to the outside zone, traffic will egress through one or the other outside interfaces, if the return traffic ingresses via the other interface, will the FW drop that traffic? In other words, are the ...

Using 2 Primary Palo410's and 1 Backup 410

Morning All, I have a total of 3 PA410's (each with their own license) that I am using remotely to build a VPN tunnel back to our PA3260 located on our campus. 2 of the 410's are being used in a primary role, each with configs that vary a bit. I'd like to use the 3rd 410 as a backup for each Primary firewall and be able to push a config from o...

Logs size

Hi We have recently moved fro, PA850 to PA1410. In the 850, we had approx 0 days of traffic retention. For some reason, in the 1410 (and also in 450), i have only 3 days of retention. It seems like they reduce the partition of logs. Does anyone know why?

chens by L3 Networker
  • 2670 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 1 Likes

CVE-2023-48795 isn't fixed in the 11.1.3-h2 as is claimed in the advisory

CVE-2023-48795 isn't fixed in the 11.1.3 as is claimed in the advisory: https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2023-48795 our Cyber Team ran a scan and still our firewalls are showing the weak cypher , even if this is disable in the configurations profiles. Somebody knows if there is something else to get this fixed? cordially, Jose Espinoza

Resolved! Active/passive failover validation was performed using Azure HA configuration getting failed due to Azure token failed with exception <urlopen

I have a palo alto VM- 300 firewall(active/passive) with version 10.1.11-h4.which is hosted in France central azure region 2 availability zone and the azure environment. While doing Azure HA failover validation on active/passive firewalls and validation passed. When we upgrade the panos version 10.2.8 for both active passive firewalls. But hear ...

PANOS-10.1.11-h4.png
PANOS-10.2.8.png

PANOS URL filtering 11.0.4

Hi folks, We have URL filtering profile enabled on our respective policies using URL categories for different services purposes( eg: wsus services we have url category with *.microsoft.com and other doamins allowed in it, similarly for redhat and other devops related having separate url category called into respective source server policies for ...

Can we use the same configuration backup

We are planning to upgrade our firewall from the VM300 model to the VM500. In this context, one of the key questions we need to address is: Can we use the same configuration backup from the VM300 firewall and upload it to the VM500 without any issues? What are the potential challenges or compatibility considerations we should be aware of during ...

Best approach on connecting two PaloAlto firewalls pairs with different networks

Hello, I am a newbie in networking, hopefully my explanation is clear, so I do have a pair of PA 3260 running in Active\Passive configuration, with multiple Layer 3 interfaces and sub interfaces connected, each one of those interfaces is a security zone, and routing is handled automatically between the interfaces. Now I want to connect the P...

maan2004 by L0 Member
  • 2418 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes
  • 1621 Posts
  • 61 Subscriptions
Top Solution Authors