This website uses Cookies. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Read our Privacy Policy.
Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.
About General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.

Discussions

Start a conversation

Multiple ISP's for Global Protect Client?

I've been messing with the setup of using multiple ISP's in an office and maintaining the functionaility of an inbound VPN client for both - aka redundancy.I guess my first question is, can a client have a Global Protect installation that is able to connect to multiple gateways? I haven't seen anything to indicate it's possible yet - maybe I ju...

cmaier by • L1 Bithead
  • 2424 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Policy complexity considerations

When creating policies, especially Security and QoS, how much consideration do I have to give to the number of policies?If we want to get very granular with these policies, will we pay any significant penalty in performance (either in device administration or performance)?(Specifically we have PA2050 that will route through 220Mbps max to intern...

sspivey by • L1 Bithead
  • 2256 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Pan OS 4.1, Destination Nat Problems

Hallo,I installed a PA500 wit Pan OS 4.1 at customer side and most thing working fine.I configured the WAN interface as DHCP-Client with default route to this interface. In NAT-Rules i want to publish a internal server to give external sources acces to this internal source (simple portforwarding). My problem is, if I configure a destination tran...

Show unused rules option

The show unused rules is very helpful but as I work at cleaning up rules after migration it would be really handy if I could clear that flag to see if the new rulesets created are handling all of the traffic before disabling the old rulesets. Is there a quick way to clear that flag so that it starts from fresh?Thanks in advanceJohn MitchellHydro...

Resolved! Is there anyway to have the URL Filtering response page to display category in the local language of the firewall Region.

Hello,I was wondering if there is any feature or ability of the firewall Response Page to display URL Filtering Category in the local language of the site it is inspecting.For example, if a user is from the Netherlands and speaks Dutch, can the Firewall located in region be set up to post the category of blocked site being surfed in Dutch?Pleas...

Eone by • Not applicable
  • 3938 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Likes

PA-500 WAN connect directly to ISP

Hello,We are using an PA-500. We would like to connect the WAN port directly to our ISP. Normally the ISP requires a Cisco router with the following requirements.Connectivity requirements:Ethernet / IEEE 802.3-2005WAN side 1000Base-T full duplex100mbit througputPPoE/PPPRFC 2516 PPPoERFC 1661 PPPRFC 1332 PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol ( B...

check to check "deny" packages

HiI have some rules that will allow IPSEC between two Windows Domain Controllers, but it only works when I allow "any" underapplication - unless I ping from both ends.So how can I see what port I am missing in my custom application group?Thanks

FlexyZ by • L3 Networker
  • 1893 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

User-id is it possible to check computers?

Hello,One of our clients want to know if it is possible to build policies based on computer membership to AD groups.In this situation we want to differentiate between computers that belongs to AD and which do not in purpose of VPN connections, so that users won't connect from private computers with SSL client.Regards,Piotr Bratkowski

Terminal Services User-ID Agent Flaw

A new customer during deployment was wanting to test how well the TS User ID agent was working at identifying users. We logged on as User A and started a specific ping. We search the log file, and there was the ping. We had it running continuous for several minutes. During a refresh, we started to notice that other users were also pinging this e...

dpayne by • L1 Bithead
  • 4218 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Likes

Anti-spoofing Question

I'm trying to compare checkpoint interface topology configuration to panos. Is there a setting in panos where you can define what networks are behind an interface?

probin02 by • Not applicable
  • 7387 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Likes

Blocking by AppID don't work as expected

HiTo block a webpage like Facebook, I have the follow two possibilities.1) Block it by the Url Filter2) Block it by the AppIDSince the URL Filter just looks at the URL and no other content. Access to Facebook will only be blocked if I try to access it by "www.facebok.com". But access via "http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=de&...

User_333 by • L2 Linker
  • 2969 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

Resolved! Custom URL wildcard

Hi all,I have a question relating to wildcards in a Custom URL Category on PA-500 - 4.1.0I have the following entry in my custom URL category *.centos.organd I'm finding that I'm getting a match with the following URL (and many others) mirror.ox.ac.uk/sites/mirror.centos.org/5.7/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5.i686.rpmIs this...

DavePalo by • L4 Transporter
  • 7353 Views
  • 9 replies
  • 1 Likes

Trouble after upgrading to 4.1

I was currently running 4.0.5 on panorama and HA active passive 2050 cluster.The upgrade ran rather smoothly.has something changed for service declaration in 4.1?I define my addresses and custom services on the panorama which I sync to the HA cluster members after committing on the panorama.My policies are defined on the first cluster member whi...

  • 24379 Posts
  • 123 Subscriptions
Top Solution Authors
View All
Top Liked Authors
View All
Labels
LEGAL NOTICES
RESOURCES
Khoros awards 2022
Copyright 2007 - 2026 - Palo Alto Networks