Config not reflecting on firewall when pushed via panorama

Hi ,

We are facing unusual issue in our enviorment .

We have pushed the changes from Panorama to devices but changes are not reflecting on individual firewall .

Verifed commit logs , no error  . All showing result succeeded .

Panorama version  - 9.x.x

MineMeld Proxy Configuration

Hello Community,

I recently installed a Minemeld VM for using O356 Feeds for Panorama EDLs.
At the moment I´m facing the issue that my Minemeld miner cannot update because of the following error which is related to the proxy configuration:

URL Filtering logs

I am using PA-500 on the version of 8.0.18 i am not able to see the URL filteing logs which has the host accessed the URL's from IP too.Kindly guide me 

Upgrade

Hello Everyone, I have a PA 5020 in version 8.0.9, what is the most stable version to update?

user-id user name issue

Hi Team,

I'm getting NETBIOS name instead of domain name. How to resolve this issue

Regards

Venky

Stack override template with IP of none

I'm trying to use the same "interface" template for all of my locations.  Unfortunately not all locations have the same number of subinterfaces.  I'm trying to override subinterfaces that aren't needed at the stack level somehow so that they are push

MineMeld upgrade process from cloud

Hello!

We have MineMeld directly on our Autofocus web service, and it shows currently that it is on version 0.9.44.post1 (AF), and after doing some reading it seems that there are a few versions after that. I have seen a lot of posts and walk throu

HA Setup

I have firewall in HA(A-P) mode.

If device priority is same on both , will there any delay in switching A-P role during failover activity ?

How to know what output and processors to use?

Hello! Forgive me if this is too broad of a question, or something that i had overlooked, but i am still quite new to using MineMeld and i've ran into a few issues where i apparently had used the wrong processor or output node, and people have correc

config on passive & pushing to active ?

Dear All,

As I have always been practicing to do the configuration and changes on the primary device and then it is its responsibility to push the configuration on the secondary device but as I have also been seeing people to do the configuration on

PAN-SA-2019-0020 ... really?

Hello Paloalto Team

Last thursday you published the securityadvisory for a critical RCE vulnerability and today you notified the customers again with an "Action recommended" article here: https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Customer-Advisories/Actio

session end reason threat

We have vendor traffic coming to PA and session end reason is threat.

Under threat i can see the threat id number

They are lot of them

For easy way I have disabled the security profile vulner protection for that rule.

Need to confirm by doing this PA