We are starting a massive refresh project that will require us to split existing firewall functions onto separate devices. Plan was to pull the existing configurations out of Panorama for each target device into Expedition and then alter and improve
As we could not able to find out the below vulnerability which is found on below model during penetration testing So , Please help us to find out the details for this vulnerability and let us know if any workaround is there or not.
Does anyone knows if it's required by Paloalto that the identification data fields during ike setup be encoded with utf8string? Or is there an incompatibility in Paloalto if these fields are encoded with printablesting?
we have Antivirus policy in place and we are seeing many, what we believe are, false positives. Mostly on PDF files. Since number is rather high, reporting each one seems a bit excessive. What they all have in common is their severity which i
In Palo alto firewall whatever the time based policies is going to expire for that we want to configure the mail alerts or reports for example if any rule is going to expire on date of 24 October we should get report or mail alert of those ru