This website uses Cookies. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Read our Privacy Policy.
Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.
About General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.

Discussions

Start a conversation

Resolved! NAT Security rule

I'm used to working on Cisco ASA and I'm having a hard time understanding why the security rule states Untrust-L3 for both the source and destination zone. Typically wouldn't that be Untrust-L3 to DMZ? Is there a specific reason for this behavior?

Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 6.57.18 PM.png
Glitchen by • L0 Member
  • 3046 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

DNS proxy not working

Hello, We are currently getting resolve-fail events for DNS. Failed to resolve domain name: after trying all attempts to name server(s): 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4DNS server is in loopback.2 Interface/Untrust/IP:203.44.x.x Below are some pics of DNS proxy settings, session details. Can someone please shed some light what are we missing?

sessiondetails.jpg
DNS Proxy.jpg
Farzana by • L4 Transporter
  • 6022 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Likes

A Fall/Autumn Question: What is your favorite Palo Alto Networks feature?

A wrap of our summer question leads into fall or autumn, as your preference may be, wherein we ask: What is your favorite Palo Alto Networks feature? Did it help solve a problem you were facing? As a former support engineer, I always like to hear when customers arrive at that a-ha moment of understanding or discovery, when the firewall does ...

jdelio by • L7 Applicator
  • 21359 Views
  • 25 replies
  • 3 Likes

Outlook and Global Protect

In the past when our users disconnected Global Protect, Outlook would disconnect immediately. Seems like this no longer the case. When GP is disconnected Outlook continues to work. I'm wondering if anyone has every eperience this before? Thanks

berket13 by • L0 Member
  • 3654 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Likes

Resolved! Expressway-E and C and NAT and VW

Hi, I have deployed Expressway (cisco ToIP) E and C as per the diagram below .PA is in VW mode .Does it work without any changes in the PA ? Or Is there any policy must be created ? Thanks

PA.png
simsim by • L4 Transporter
  • 3110 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Resolved! How to escape special characters (i.e. colon) in miner rule

Hi, I have a rule for Panos syslog miner to block FTP brute force login attempt that is not working. I suspect this is because the threat_name has a colon in it, and is not being parsed properly. This is what my rule looks like: conditions: - type == "THREAT" - log_subtype == "vulnerability" - severity == "high" - src_zone == "WAN" - dest_...

Response Page Issue

https://mail.yahoo.com (web based email) and https://web.tresorit.com (online storage and backup) are both blocked via url category filter as per screen shot. But... I am only getting the response page for mail.yahoo.com.web.tresorit.com just gets page cannot be displayed. the policy is working as expected but i need the response page for the ...

URL-Block.png
Mick_Ball by • L7 Applicator
  • 2619 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

IPSEC VPN Tunnel Failover and Nexus 7K VPC Design

Hello, A and B question: A. We have two Palos in A/S. The active has a functioning IPSEC VPN tunnel terminated to it. Is there any way to have the tunnel renegotiate to the S when it becomes A? B. What is the proper way to design an A/S PA/Nexus 7k VPC environment, to best utilize the advantages of VPC technology? Thank you

Halloween challenge: take your shot at winning a Live Community hoodie!

In the wake of the success we had at the Live Community booth at Ignite2017, I'd like to start a new tradition and what better time to have a little fun than Halloween? So I'd like to challenge you guys and girls of the Live community to either flaunt your 1337 h4x0r skills at integrating into something odd/fun/weird, or just be quirky and try f...

reaper by • Cyber Elite
  • 5431 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 2 Likes

Resolved! LDAP group member enumeration problem

I am running PAN OS 8.0.7 and having a problem with getting the members of a group enumerated by the firewall. The group is shown by the firewall in the GUI and can be added to security policies, and the CLI if I run the "show user group list" command, I can see the group in the list that I have added to the Group-Mapping settings.The problem is...

rbentley by • L0 Member
  • 4656 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Strange packet drop

Hello guys, I have a PA820 in active/passive mode who has a strange behaviour. I have created a rule that permits that traffic but the device drops it. I see "allow"in the logs, but with a capture I can clearly see the SYN in the dropped section and not "syn/ack" and "ack". I have also tried to put an "any/any" rules, it matches but the behaviou...

PA_log_forum.png
PA_rule_forum.png
Shye80 by • L1 Bithead
  • 2929 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes
  • 24432 Posts
  • 125 Subscriptions
Top Solution Authors
View All
Labels
LEGAL NOTICES
RESOURCES
Khoros awards 2022
Copyright 2007 - 2026 - Palo Alto Networks