This website uses Cookies. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Read our Privacy Policy.
Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.
About General Topics
Post a discussion here if you have general questions regarding configuration and troubleshooting for Palo Alto Networks products. Use this forum to collaborate with like-minded security professionals to improve your security posture.

Discussions

Start a conversation

Resolved! FIPS Failure upon boot

One of devices was not properly shut down due to a power outage in a building. When the device started back up, it appears that it entered maintenance mode. The reason is FIPS failure. I have attempted to reboot the device from maintenance mode and appeared to work (was able to get to the normal prompt for asking password when attempting ssh)...

BryanSG by • L0 Member
  • 10914 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

QoS max egress, no effect

Hi there, I'm playing with QoS in our lab. I have a simple setup with two queue, first for SMB traffic, second for RDP traffic.The max egress value is set, but when I transfer data, then both queues get bandwith values. What I am doing wrong here?

PA QoS Monitor.png
PA QoS Profile.png
PA QoS Policies.png
Netzer by • L3 Networker
  • 2747 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

active-directory-base application isn't match traffic when services/URL Category is set to "application-default" in security rule

Hello,I use a Firewall at version 10.0.8-h8. I wrote a rule to allow the application "active-directory-base" (which contains several ports) in the application section then "application-default" in the services/URL category section as recommended by PA. The observation I made is that the flow never matches this rule. It is even dropped by the int...

Ouattara by • L0 Member
  • 3514 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

site to site VPN on TP-link --- PALO ALTO ---- AWS

As of now STORE router/POS1 able to reach the head office(PALO ALTO) via site to site VPN and HeadOffice(PAN) to AWS also working via site to site VPN. But our main goal is that POS1/Store able to reach the AWS network. As of the momment POS1 not able to reach the AWS networks. I already tried to add a route on the PAN from Store network going t...

IPSEC S2S store to HO to AWSrev1 .jpg

global protect connectivity issue (version 5.2.10)

Hi Team, We have facing the connectivity issue on GP Agent 5.2.10. After turning off the windows firewall, it's connecting. Please let us know how we can achieve this without disabling the windows firewall. Because in earlier versions of GP client we have never asked users to follow this method and it’s not recommended to turn off the windows fi...

VishnuPS by • L3 Networker
  • 3073 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 1 Likes

User-ID Agent not mapping users

Hello, Im trying to configure User-ID Agent. Dedicated users is created, with details acroding to: Create a Dedicated Service Account for the User-ID Agent (paloaltonetworks.com)Agent version: 10.0.4-23Agent is installed on Windows Server 2019.DC's are on Windows Server 2019.All is up to date. This is the status of the agent: But still this is...

mgwozdz_1-1644489742592.png
mgwozdz_2-1644489787346.png
mgwozdz by • L1 Bithead
  • 2668 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Path Monitoring Static Routes

Hello All, For some locations we have 2xISP setup, since we have no dynamic peering with any of those, we do a default static route via each of those. Having 'ECMP/Source IP hash' enabled it works just fine in a lab. We also do path monitoring for each of default route, pining different remote hosts like 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 etc. Do we need actual s...

Dynamic DNS Bind server updates from DHCP

Curious if the PA-3220 we are looking to use can dynamically send DNS updates to our Bind9 server whenever a DHCP request is granted from our PA DHCP scope we've setup? I know we can get a linux version of DHCP on our Linux server, but would rather leverage the gui of the Palo for DHCP. We are not a windows environment so windows DHCP and DNS is...

tfleming by • L0 Member
  • 3287 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes

Decrypted traffic via firewall.

I don't have any decryption policy configured.But I see port -443 traffic has decrypted flag yes in Traffic logs.Is it normal for firewall to decrypt 443 traffic even when there isno decryption policy?PANOS0-9.1.10 VM-300

API URL Logs Issue

In the below code - I"m using the API to query the URL logs. It works great.What isn't returning though is the src.user field, if it's mapped. How can I get this value? Do I need to do a separate query? # Build PAN API Connection and get token pan_conn = pan.xapi.PanXapi(api_username=args.pan_username, api_password=ar...

mehixiyo by • L0 Member
  • 2107 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

Apply TS Agent config automatically in FW

Hi, We are expanding our CITRIX platfon in which we have installed a Palo Alto TS agent to monitor. So to avoid introduce manually the TS agent config in Pa (IP, port,etc) each new citrix. Is there any way to send the config to PA to do ir automatically? I was checking and the API can not send this TS config. Any idea? i dont think this is possi...

BigPalo by • L4 Transporter
  • 1864 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes

FW loses user mapping stop matching rule suddenly

Hi, We are having a strange issue in our FW. User in VPN-SSL reported the stop working. The issue doesnt have any pattern. Random users, random time-range. The issue is solved when the customer force to reconnect the VPN or force pass the HIP check in GPclient. This is what we see in FW monitor logs. The FW stops identifying user and jump the ru...

hipra logs.JPG
BigPalo by • L4 Transporter
  • 4835 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Likes

Patching One HA fully then the next.

If patching a HA pair to the next Major version i.e. 9.0.6 -> 9.1.0 is it safe to patch one of the pair all the way to 9.1.0 (minor versions and major versions) And then fail over and do the other firewall to bring that up to latest minor and finally on to the major version. Or should both firewalls be running the same latest minor version ...

  • 24401 Posts
  • 123 Subscriptions
Top Solution Authors
View All
Labels
LEGAL NOTICES
RESOURCES
Khoros awards 2022
Copyright 2007 - 2026 - Palo Alto Networks